Override "1 user, 1 test" with QA Assistant
under review
J
Jacqui Dent
I am part of a UX team running multiple tests every fortnight. As our capacity to launch tests increases, so too does the risk of tests overlapping. We were excited to discover the "1 user, 1 test" feature which would mitigate the risk of overlapping tests contaminating data. However, we've discovered this feature makes it difficult for us to QA our tests.
As we are on the website all the time QA'ing and checking in on tests, of course myself and my colleagues are all bucketed into past or current tests, which means we are automatically rejected from test targeting for any test we are trying to QA with this feature turned on.
As a workaround, we can QA our tests and then afterwards turn on the "1 user, 1 test" feature. However, that prevents us from QAing and launching any future tests while the test requiring this feature is switched on. As we would only want to use "1 user, 1 test" when we are running many tests, this seems to make the feature a bit redundant. We can do manual QA but that is cumbersome.
It would be great if the QA assistant could override "1 user, 1 test" settings so that we can have this feature running, have interacted with other current or recent tests, and still be able to use the QA assistant for new tests.
Léo Wiel
Hello Jacqui Dent,
Thank you for your feedback!
We are currently designing a major update of our QA Assistant and the behavior you are describing is on our top priority list of things we want to improve.
We are aware that it can be a pain to have to enter a test to be able to QA it. It is not only 1 visitor / 1 test, but also the whole targeting that needs to be validated. Our plan is to give our users an option to force the display of a campaign, even if the conditions are not met at all, whatever they are.
I can't give a proper ETA for this project, but we will be designing the solution probably before the end of 2024.
J
Jacqui Dent
Léo Wiel Wonderful, looking forward to it!
Arthur Charbit
under review